I tell you that al Qaida and Islamic terrorism is a threat. You dismiss them as a minor annoyance at best. In the same breath though you're bringing up Pat Robertson, as if he's a threat to anybody, except possibly making some people laugh themselves to death. Your idea of a terrorist is he? He actually performs a public service for shitheads such as you because he gives you somebody to hyperventilate about, and you can pretend that he represents conservative thought.

And Chris Matthew, who has been probably the most prominent of the Obama cheerleaders in the media, who has homoerotic tingles running up his leg when Obama speaks and announces that he considers it his job to make the Obama presidency a success– stange job for a journalist and reporter, that is– morphs in your world into a right-wing conservative. Well, he doesn't speak for this conservative, my friend.

An exchange with you is like a trip into one of those alternative string theory universes where the laws of nature are changed in odd and unaccountable ways.

I made no threats against you, asshole. I didn't appreciate you calling me a coward, and I suggested that if you met me face to face that you would very probably be the one shitting his pants. The offer still stands. If you want to call me a coward to my face, look me up and we'll discuss the subject.

We can keep the country safe perfectly well, as we have in the past, without the paranoia the rightists want us to fear. The simple fact about at Qaeda in the US is that there are just not many of them, and they are not normally very competent. Remember, there's been one successful attack they've made; and that one will never be repeated. But yo accuse me of not wanting to defend my country – really, how do you have the gall to claim that? Don't be a moron; and apologize for that shit.

I'll consider the possibility of nuclear, chemical or biological attacks along with terrorists attacking us with a giant laser from outer space, raising zombies, or traveling back in time to assassinate George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. That's all within the realm of science fiction, and is not going to happen outside of TV, movies or paranoid fantasies.

If losses to terrorists have been kept low, there's a reason for that. Plots have been aborted before execution and many many terrrorists have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq and other fields of battle. And the fact that those losses are low does not mean that we do nothing while camelfucker al Qaida assholes attempt to kill American citizens. I suggest you try running a campaign with the slogan that al Qaida hasn't really killed all that many people and see how far it takes you. That is not a viable foreign affairs or a national security strategy excerpt perhaps for a cunt like you who doesn't have the balls to defend his country and his fellow citizens against attack.

And if you want to talk about probabilities, my fine left-leaning friend with his head so far up his ass it's a wonder he can breath, I suggest you consider the possibilities of nuclear terror or chemical or biological attacks which are much more within the realm of possibility than some leftist crap about us all drowning when the oceans rise twenty feet next year.

Anybody who considers that manloving Obama asskissing Chris Matthews a conservative right-winger really has lost touch with reality.

And all your descriptions that you use to justify your racism (yeah, you claim it's just against the religion; but then why use the non-religious “camelfucker” as your horrendously offensive insult?) apply equally to fundamentalist Christianity; the only difference is that our theocrats are not in power, although they are always trying to change that. The Pat Robertson crowd would be stoning gay people, nonbelievers, women who have sex and other “unclean” people left and right if they could.

Yeah, Islam is dumb and dangerous because it's a religion; it's no better or worse than any other. Unfortunately, evil little bigots like you have decided that overt racism is perfectly OK.

But then, yeah, you're stupid enough to think the right-wing media is liberal. Hey, you bring up MSNBC – but then mention the conservative Matthews, the man who got weird man-crushes on several of the Repubican candidates for president last year, as a counter-example, so that kind of disproves the point you're pretending to try to make.

But why am I arguing with you? You're a person who has stated to me that MSNBC, the station of Chris Mathews and Keith Olbermann, is “right wing.” You've also stated that Republicans pose a larger terrorist threat than Islamic radicals. You have a rather unique world view, and I am not interested in wasting my time exploring it any further. Cheerio!